The Little Book of Valuation
Chapter 1, "Value—More Than a Number!" f
Understanding the Terrain
Oscar Wilde's definition of a cynic sets the stage: someone who knows "the price of everything and the value of nothing." This sentiment applies to many investors who focus on market movements rather than true value.
The principle behind sound investing is simple: an investor should not pay more for an asset than it is worth. To follow this principle, one must know how to value the asset being considered.
While some may argue that value is subjective and based on future investor perceptions, the book refutes this, emphasizing that financial assets are bought for the cash flows they generate, and the price of a stock cannot be justified solely by expected future buyers paying more.
The metaphor of a game of musical chairs is used to caution investors: if you’re paying based on future price expectations alone, you risk being left with an overvalued asset when the "music stops."
Two Approaches to Valuation
Intrinsic Valuation:
Intrinsic value is based on the cash flows the asset will generate over its life and the certainty (or uncertainty) of these cash flows.
Assets with higher and more stable cash flows are worth more than those with lower and volatile ones.
A practical example: A property with long-term tenants and high rent is worth more than a speculative one with lower and uncertain income.
Relative Valuation:
Most assets are valued relative to similar assets. This means that, for example, you would value a stock by comparing it to other stocks in the same industry or sector.
For a stock like Exxon Mobil, it could be considered a buy if it’s trading at a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio than its peers, even if that lower price doesn’t reflect its intrinsic value.
Though intrinsic valuation gives a deeper understanding of a business's drivers, relative valuation can sometimes be more practical or reflective of the current market sentiment.
Why Should You Care?
Intrinsic valuation offers a complete picture of what drives value, whereas relative valuation reflects market sentiment and peer comparisons. Both approaches have their place.
Investors increase their odds of success by buying stocks that are undervalued both on intrinsic and relative bases.
Some Truths About Valuation
Valuation can appear complex, but the book simplifies it by explaining the core concepts that drive the value of companies and how investors can practically apply them.
Start Your Engines!
Many investors avoid valuing companies because of perceived complexity, lack of information, or uncertainty. However, valuation models can be simplified, and there’s always some uncertainty.
Being wrong is part of the process. Success in investing doesn't come from being right all the time but from being wrong less often than everyone else.
This chapter lays the foundation for understanding valuation by introducing intrinsic and relative valuation methods, emphasizing their importance in making informed investment decisions.
Chapter 2, "Power Tools of the Trade"
Introduction
The chapter introduces essential tools for valuation, focusing on three key areas:
Time Value of Money
Risk
Statistics
Time Value of Money
The time value of money is a foundational concept, suggesting that a dollar today is worth more than a dollar tomorrow due to inflation, risk, and consumption preferences.
Discounting is the process used to translate future cash flows into present values, and it accounts for these three factors:
Consumption Preferences: People prefer to consume now rather than later.
Inflation: Money loses purchasing power over time.
Risk: Future cash flows carry uncertainty.
The chapter explains the use of discount rates to adjust future cash flows, calculating the present value of future cash flows using this formula:
[ \text{PV} = \frac{CF}{(1 + r)^t} ]
where ( CF ) is the future cash flow, ( r ) is the discount rate, and ( t ) is the time period.
Types of Cash Flows
The chapter outlines five types of cash flows:
Simple cash flows: A single future payment.
Annuities: Regular payments for a fixed period.
Growing annuities: Payments that grow over time, for a limited period.
Perpetuities: Constant payments indefinitely.
Growing perpetuities: Payments that grow over time indefinitely.
Present value calculations allow comparisons of these different types of cash flows across time periods.
Grappling with Risk
Risk plays a crucial role in valuation, as investors must assess the uncertainty of future cash flows.
The risk premium compensates investors for taking on additional uncertainty, and it is included in the discount rate.
The chapter highlights different models for calculating risk-adjusted discount rates, such as the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), which factors in the risk-free rate, the asset's beta (its volatility relative to the market), and the expected market return.
Accounting 101
The chapter emphasizes understanding a company's financial statements to assess its earnings, cash flow, and risk.
Income statements reflect earnings and expenses.
Balance sheets provide insights into a company’s assets, liabilities, and equity.
Cash flow statements offer a view of actual cash inflows and outflows.
Understanding these financial statements is critical for estimating the company's value based on its performance and health.
Making Sense of Data
Valuation requires interpreting large amounts of financial and market data. The chapter introduces basic statistical tools to help process this data:
Mean and median: Key measures of central tendency, where the median can be more useful when data is skewed.
Correlation: Measures how two variables move together, with values ranging from -1 (perfect negative correlation) to 1 (perfect positive correlation).
Regression analysis: A tool to quantify relationships between variables. For example, how changes in inflation might affect interest rates.
The Tool Box Is Full
The chapter concludes by summarizing the various tools at your disposal for valuing companies. Time value concepts help compare cash flows over time, risk and return models allow for adjustments based on uncertainty, and statistical measures help manage and interpret large datasets.
This chapter provides foundational concepts necessary for understanding how to compare and value financial assets, highlighting the practical tools needed for the valuation process .
Chapter 3, Yes, Virginia, Every Asset Has an Intrinsic Value
Valuing a Business or Equity
Intrinsic valuation determines the value of a business by discounting expected cash flows back at a risk-adjusted rate.
The approach can either value the entire business (enterprise valuation) or focus on the equity of the business.
Firm Valuation: In this method, all the cash flows (before debt payments) are discounted using the overall cost of capital (combining both debt and equity). This is useful to estimate the value of the entire business.
Equity Valuation: This method values just the equity by discounting the cash flows left after debt payments using the cost of equity. You subtract the company’s debt to get equity value when valuing the entire firm.
Inputs to Intrinsic Valuation
There are four basic inputs necessary to estimate the intrinsic value of a firm:
Cash flows from existing assets: These are the cash flows net of reinvestment needs and taxes.
Expected growth: The expected growth rate of cash flows over a forecast period.
Cost of financing: This is the cost of both debt and equity, known as the cost of capital.
Terminal value: The estimated worth of the firm at the end of the forecast period, which often forms a large portion of the valuation.
These inputs can be estimated from the perspective of either the entire firm or just the equity investors.
Cash Flows
The simplest measure of cash flow is dividends, which represent the direct payments to shareholders.
However, since many companies use stock buybacks instead of dividends, you should consider augmented dividends, which combine dividends with stock buybacks.
To estimate the cash that could have been returned to investors, you calculate Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE). FCFE measures the cash left over after taxes, reinvestment needs, and debt payments.
Expected Growth
Growth is typically estimated from historical data or forecasts.
The growth rate needs to be realistic and sustainable over time. It can be projected over a specific period, after which the company is assumed to enter a stable growth phase.
Discount Rates
Discount rates reflect the riskiness of cash flows and are usually determined using models like the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM).
Cost of capital includes both debt and equity financing costs, while cost of equity includes only the equity portion and factors in the risk borne by equity holders.
Terminal Value
A company’s terminal value is the estimate of its value at the end of the forecast period, assuming the company continues to operate indefinitely.
This value is critical as it can represent a substantial portion of the total valuation, particularly for long-term investments.
Intrinsic Value and Market Price
If intrinsic value differs from the market price, the reasons could include:
Errors or unrealistic assumptions in the cash flow, growth, or risk estimates.
Incorrect risk premium assessments for the market.
Market mispricing, with the investor's intrinsic valuation being more accurate than the market.
However, even if the intrinsic value is correct, it may take time for the market to adjust and reflect the true value of the stock.
Conclusion
Every asset has an intrinsic value, and the chapter outlines how to determine it by focusing on the fundamentals of cash flows, growth, risk, and terminal value. Even though markets may fluctuate, intrinsic value forms the foundation of a company's worth.
This chapter emphasizes the importance of understanding the core drivers of value in a company and how to estimate them correctly.
Chapter 4, It’s All Relative!
Overview: Understanding Relative Valuation
Relative valuation involves valuing an asset by comparing it to similar assets in the market. The idea is to find comparables, scale their prices to a common measure, and adjust for differences to find bargains or overpriced assets.
This approach is more reflective of market sentiment and mood than intrinsic valuation, which is based on a company’s fundamentals (cash flows, growth, and risk).
The Three Steps of Relative Valuation:
Find comparable assets: These are companies in the same industry or with similar characteristics.
Standardize prices: Use common variables such as earnings, revenues, or book value to make the companies comparable.
Adjust for differences: Control for factors like growth, risk, and cash flows when comparing standardized prices.
Real-World Example:
If Dell is trading at 17 times earnings, Apple at 21 times, and Microsoft at 11 times, a key question is: which stock is the best deal? This comparison assumes that they are similar enough to be compared but requires adjustments for factors like growth rates, technology, and market positioning.
Standardized Values and Multiples:
Multiples are used to standardize prices. Examples include:
Price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio: Market value of equity divided by net income.
Enterprise value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA): Market value of operating assets relative to operating cash flows.
Price-to-sales or price-to-book ratios.
The objective of standardizing prices through these multiples is to allow comparisons across companies, even if they differ in size or structure.
Adjusting for Differences:
The process doesn’t end with finding comparable companies and calculating multiples. Adjustments are required to reflect differences in:
Growth: Higher-growth firms should trade at higher multiples.
Risk: Riskier firms should trade at lower multiples.
Cash flow potential: Firms with greater potential to generate future cash flows should be priced higher.
Four Keys to Using Multiples:
Consistency: Make sure that both the numerator and denominator in the multiple reflect the same perspective (e.g., equity vs. firm value).
Distribution: Understand the distribution of the multiple (is it skewed?).
Determinants: Identify and account for the factors (risk, growth) that drive the multiple.
Comparison: Use comparable firms for meaningful results.
The Comparison Between Intrinsic and Relative Value:
Intrinsic valuation: Focuses on the company’s internal fundamentals (cash flows, growth, and risk).
Relative valuation: Reflects how the market prices the company compared to peers, which could reveal overvaluation or undervaluation based on market sentiment.
The two approaches may yield different results; for example, a company could appear overvalued on an intrinsic basis but undervalued on a relative basis if its peers are overpriced.
Conclusion: The Appeal and Challenge of Relative Valuation
Relative valuation is faster, requires less information, and often aligns with market trends, which is why it is commonly used.
However, the challenge is finding truly comparable companies and making proper adjustments for growth, risk, and cash flow differences.
This chapter emphasizes that while relative valuation is more straightforward and often aligned with market behavior, it still requires diligence in ensuring that comparisons are meaningful and that key differences between companies are properly accounted for.
Chapter 5, "Promise Aplenty,"
Valuing Young Growth Companies
This chapter focuses on the complexities of valuing young growth companies—businesses with significant potential but little to no operating history or revenue. An example given is Google’s 2010 attempt to buy Groupon for $6 billion, which faced challenges in valuation due to Groupon’s lack of operating history.
Common Attributes of Young Growth Companies
No Historical Performance Data: Many young companies only have a few years of financial data, and some have financials for only part of the year.
Low or Nonexistent Revenues and Losses: Early-stage businesses often operate at a loss, with expenses related to establishing the business rather than generating revenue.
High Risk of Failure: Many young companies do not survive. A study mentioned highlights that only 31% of companies founded in 1998 survived seven years.
Illiquid Investments: Even public young companies tend to have low market capitalization and limited trading volumes.
Multiple Claims on Equity: Venture capitalists and early investors may have first claims on cash flows, making equity valuation more complicated.
Valuation Challenges
The lack of historical data, operating losses, and the high probability of failure complicate the valuation process for these companies. Traditional methods struggle with these uncertainties.
Valuation Solutions
Focus on Revenues: For companies without profits, analysts must focus on revenue growth and how scalable the business model is.
Assess Target Margins: Identify how long it will take for the business to become profitable by projecting operating margins.
Survival Probability: Analysts must estimate the likelihood of the company surviving the critical early years. This is a unique factor in young company valuation, compared to mature companies.
Are We Missing Something?
The chapter concludes with a discussion of missing variables in traditional valuation models when applied to young growth firms, specifically the difficulty in estimating sustainable growth and dealing with a lack of reliable financial data.
This chapter emphasizes the risks and rewards of investing in young companies, highlighting how conventional valuation methods must be adjusted to account for uncertainties related to growth, profitability, and survival.
Chapter 6, "Growing Pains,"
Overview: Valuing Growth Companies
This chapter delves into the process of valuing growth companies like Google, which transitioned from a small startup to a multi-billion dollar corporation.
The two main challenges with valuing growth companies are:
Sustainability of growth: Determining how long and at what rate the company will continue growing.
Changing risk profile: As a company grows, its risk and cost of capital evolve.
Definition of a Growth Company
Growth companies are often distinguished by their dependence on future investments for a large portion of their value.
These companies have significant growth potential but can vary widely in size, growth rates, and returns on invested capital.
Growth companies are not confined to specific sectors (e.g., tech). They can exist in various industries as long as their value comes from expected future investments.
Common Characteristics of Growth Companies:
Dynamic Financials: Growth companies tend to show highly volatile financial metrics like earnings, book value, and margins.
High Reinvestment Rates: They often need to reinvest a large portion of their profits to sustain their growth trajectory.
Margin Pressure: Growth companies often face lower initial margins due to large upfront costs but expect them to improve as they scale.
Uncertain Risk Profiles: The high growth and uncertain outcomes make determining an appropriate cost of capital challenging.
Valuation Issues for Growth Companies
Revenue Growth: Estimating revenue growth is a key driver of value. However, it can be difficult to predict due to competition and market size uncertainties.
Margin Adjustments: Operating margins might be low initially but should improve as economies of scale kick in.
Terminal Value: Given that a large portion of a growth company’s value might be tied to the terminal value (future value when growth stabilizes), making appropriate assumptions about future growth rates and risk is crucial.
Risk and Discount Rates: High uncertainty means that discount rates must reflect the risk of the business failing or its competitive position eroding over time.
Valuation Solutions
Revenue Scaling: A company’s ability to scale revenues without proportionally increasing costs is a critical aspect of its valuation.
Margin Normalization: It’s necessary to project how the current operating margins will trend over time. For instance, margins might increase as the company matures, or they could shrink if competitors enter the market.
Discounting Cash Flows: Using the appropriate discount rate is essential in reflecting both the risk and the growth potential of the firm.
Takeaways
Valuing growth companies involves a balance between estimating the company’s future growth potential and the risks associated with scaling.
Investors should closely monitor the evolution of the company’s cost structure, margins, and competitive landscape to adjust their valuation models accordingly.
Chapter 7, Valuation Viagra
Valuing Mature Companies
Mature companies like Coca-Cola, Hormel Foods, and General Electric have been in existence for a long time. While they seem easier to value due to their established operating and market history, changes in how they are run can affect their stock value.
Mature companies typically derive their value primarily from existing investments rather than future growth.
Characteristics of Mature Companies
Revenue Growth Approaching Economic Growth Rate: Revenue growth for mature companies tends to align with the nominal growth rate of the overall economy.
Established Margins: These companies usually have stable operating margins, though commodity and cyclical firms might experience fluctuating margins due to macroeconomic variables.
Competitive Advantages: While some firms lose competitive edges over time, others, like Coca-Cola, maintain strong brand names and continue to earn high returns.
Debt Capacity: Mature companies tend to have higher cash flows, allowing for greater debt capacity. Some may choose to take advantage of this while others retain conservative financing strategies developed during their growth phases.
Cash Build-Up and Returns: As earnings rise and reinvestment needs decrease, mature companies generate excess cash. If not returned to shareholders through dividends, this cash can accumulate.
Acquisition-Driven Growth: With fewer internal investment opportunities, mature firms may resort to acquisitions to boost revenues, earnings, and sometimes, value.
Valuation Considerations
Valuing mature companies requires a focus on their existing assets rather than future growth potential. This contrasts with growth companies that are valued based on expectations of future investments.
Leverage can play a key role in increasing value for these firms. For example, increasing debt usage can lead to higher equity returns, especially for companies that have traditionally underutilized their debt capacity.
Solutions and Management Impact
Changes in management practices can create value in mature companies. Restructuring, optimizing capital structure, and spinning off underperforming divisions are common strategies to unlock value.
This chapter emphasizes the importance of focusing on existing investments and optimizing capital structure for mature companies, while considering the potential impact of management decisions on long-term value【19:0†source】.
Chapter 8, Doomsday
Valuing Declining Companies
The chapter deals with the challenges of valuing declining companies. As companies age, they may enter a period of decline due to shrinking markets, loss of competitive advantage, or poor management decisions. Declining companies can still offer investment opportunities for those who understand how to value them properly.
Characteristics of Declining Companies
Stagnant or Declining Revenues: These firms often experience flat or declining revenues, which may be below the inflation rate. This revenue stagnation is a strong signal that the company is losing market share or is in an industry-wide downturn.
Shrinking or Negative Margins: Declining firms typically face shrinking margins as they lose pricing power. Competitors might be more aggressive, and the company may struggle to maintain profitability.
Excess Capacity: Declining companies frequently have more production capacity than they can use profitably. As a result, they may hold on to underutilized assets that drain resources.
Poor Returns on Capital: Existing assets in declining firms usually earn below the cost of capital, making them value-destroying instead of value-adding.
High Debt Levels: Declining firms often have high levels of debt relative to their reduced earnings, creating distress risk and potential for bankruptcy.
Valuation Issues for Declining Firms
Revenue Forecasting: Predicting the future for declining companies is difficult since there is little to no growth expected, and the risk of continued deterioration remains high.
Shrinking Margins: Profit margins typically decrease further as the company shrinks, exacerbating financial difficulties.
Liquidation and Default: In the worst cases, companies may face bankruptcy or liquidation. Valuation models for such companies should consider these potential outcomes.
Valuation Solutions
Stable Decline Assumption: Some firms may face a stable decline, where revenues and profits drop steadily but in a predictable manner. In this scenario, valuation models should assume a long-term decline rather than growth.
Asset-Based Valuation: For companies in severe decline, asset-based valuation (e.g., liquidation value) may be more appropriate than cash flow-based models. The firm’s tangible assets, such as real estate or machinery, might be sold off to return value to shareholders.
Distressed Valuation: Investors should consider distress probabilities and factor in scenarios where the company might default on its debt. A weighted average of different outcomes (survival, restructuring, or bankruptcy) is used to estimate the firm’s value in distressed situations.
Investment Strategies in Declining Companies
High-Yield Strategy: Some declining companies can still provide value if they recognize their decline and manage it effectively. Investors may receive large dividends or returns through stock buybacks as the company shrinks. This strategy is akin to investing in a high-yield bond.
Turnaround Play: Another strategy is to invest in distressed companies with the hope that they can turn around their operations. Successful turnarounds can deliver substantial returns, but this approach requires selecting firms with solid assets and a credible path to recovery, such as debt restructuring or new capital injections.
Key Takeaways:
Declining companies share several common features, including stagnant revenues, shrinking margins, and distress risk. Valuing these companies requires adjusting for their decline and considering outcomes such as liquidation or restructuring.
Investors can profit from declining companies either by seeking dividends and buybacks from managed decline or by betting on turnaround plays where distressed companies recover and grow again.
This chapter highlights the nuances of valuing companies that are in the decline phase and provides strategies for assessing potential investment opportunities in such firms.
Chapter 9, Bank on It
Valuing Financial Service Companies
This chapter addresses the unique challenges involved in valuing financial service companies such as banks, insurance firms, and investment firms. Valuing these companies differs significantly from valuing traditional manufacturing or service companies due to their distinct business models, regulatory constraints, and the nature of their financial statements.
Types of Financial Service Firms
Banks: Make money through the spread between interest paid on deposits and interest earned on loans. They also offer various financial services to customers.
Insurance Companies: Earn income from premiums and investing the funds until claims are paid.
Investment Banks: Make money by providing advisory services (e.g., mergers and acquisitions) and helping firms raise capital.
Investment Firms: Manage portfolios for clients and earn fees for their advisory and portfolio management services.
With the consolidation in the financial services industry, many firms now operate in multiple areas, which adds complexity to their valuation.
Key Valuation Challenges
Regulatory Constraints:
Financial firms are subject to strict regulatory capital ratios, which determine the minimum amount of equity they must hold relative to their assets. These regulations limit a firm’s ability to grow by preventing excessive leverage.
Banks and insurance companies are also limited in how they invest their funds and the business activities they can engage in, such as investment banking or taking equity positions in non-financial firms.
Accounting Rules:
The assets of financial service firms are often financial instruments like loans and bonds. Because these assets are marked to market (i.e., valued at their current market price), the book value of equity for financial firms may fluctuate more than for non-financial firms.
Measuring cash flows is difficult for financial service firms, as net capital expenditures and working capital are not easily defined in the same way as for non-financial companies.
Valuation Solutions
Equity Valuation:
Since valuing the firm (enterprise valuation) is complicated due to unclear definitions of debt and reinvestment, most analysts focus on equity valuation for financial firms. This involves estimating future dividends and discounting them using a cost of equity.
Dividend Discount Model (DDM):
Given the difficulty in measuring cash flows, financial firms are often valued using dividend discount models (DDM), which estimate the present value of expected future dividends. This model assumes that dividends are the best representation of cash flows to equity.
The growth rate of dividends is crucial and depends on the firm’s return on equity (ROE) and its payout ratio (proportion of earnings paid as dividends).
Excess Return Model:
An alternative approach is to focus on excess returns: the difference between the return on equity (ROE) and the cost of equity. If a firm earns above its cost of equity, it generates excess returns, which increase its value. This model values the firm by adding the present value of expected excess returns to the current book value of equity.
Relative Valuation:
Financial service firms are also valued using price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios and price-to-book (P/B) ratios. The P/B ratio is particularly important for banks and insurance companies because book value is a key measure of their net worth.
The P/B ratio is influenced by the firm’s ROE, payout ratio, growth potential, and risk level. A higher ROE generally results in a higher P/B ratio, while higher risk or lower growth prospects lead to lower multiples.
Key Takeaways:
Capital Buffers: Look for firms that not only meet but exceed regulatory capital requirements, as stronger capital buffers reduce risk.
Operating Risk: Evaluate the risk profile of the business areas the firm operates in, as riskier segments may generate higher returns but also increase the firm’s overall risk.
Transparency: Focus on firms with transparent financial reporting, as lack of clarity can mask risk.
Barriers to Entry: Invest in firms that operate in industries with high barriers to entry, as these firms are more likely to sustain high returns on equity.
This chapter emphasizes that financial service companies are highly regulated, making it essential for investors to understand their regulatory capital, risk exposure, and transparency in financial reporting .
Here are the detailed notes for Chapter 9, Bank on It, from The Little Book of Valuation:
Valuing Financial Service Companies
This chapter delves into the complexities of valuing financial service companies like banks, insurance firms, and investment companies. These businesses present unique valuation challenges compared to non-financial firms due to the nature of their assets, liabilities, and regulatory environment.
Key Challenges in Valuing Financial Service Firms:
Regulatory Constraints:
Financial institutions are subject to strict regulatory capital requirements, which determine how much equity capital they must maintain relative to their assets. These capital ratios restrict leverage and influence the firm’s ability to expand or take on new risks.
For example, banks are required to maintain certain Tier 1 capital ratios, which limit their leverage, influencing how much they can lend or invest.
Defining Debt and Equity:
Financial service companies do not operate with traditional debt and capital structure models. Since most of their "debt" consists of deposits (in the case of banks) or premiums (in the case of insurance firms), it's hard to apply standard capital structure analysis.
As a result, valuing financial firms generally focuses on equity valuation rather than the firm’s overall value.
Mark-to-Market Accounting:
The assets of financial service firms are largely financial instruments, like loans or securities, which are subject to mark-to-market accounting. This means their values fluctuate with market conditions, affecting the book value of the firm and complicating comparisons over time.
Valuation Approaches for Financial Service Firms
Equity Valuation Models:
Due to the nature of the financial sector’s capital structure, the focus is on valuing equity, specifically using models that calculate the value of dividends, which represent returns to equity holders.
The Dividend Discount Model (DDM) is a commonly used approach, where future dividends are projected and discounted to the present using the firm’s cost of equity. This assumes that dividends are a reasonable proxy for cash flows.
Excess Return Models:
Another method is using excess returns: the returns on equity (ROE) over and above the cost of equity. If a firm earns more than its cost of equity, it generates excess returns, which can add value to the firm.
The model adds the present value of these excess returns to the current book value of equity to arrive at the firm’s intrinsic value.
Relative Valuation:
Financial companies are often valued using price-to-book (P/B) ratios and price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios. These multiples are linked to a firm’s profitability, measured by return on equity (ROE), risk profile, and growth potential.
P/B ratios are particularly important for banks and insurance companies, where book value is a key indicator of net worth and capital strength.
Return on Equity (ROE) and Payout Ratios:
ROE is central to financial firm valuations, and its relationship with growth is significant. Growth for financial firms can be estimated using the retention ratio (portion of profits retained) and the ROE.
Payout ratios—the proportion of earnings paid out as dividends—are important in projecting future dividends in the Dividend Discount Model (DDM).
Key Factors to Watch
Capital Adequacy: A firm’s ability to meet regulatory capital requirements is crucial. Companies with stronger capital bases can weather financial downturns and regulatory pressures better.
Risk Exposure: Financial institutions face risks related to their lending or investment portfolios. Investors should carefully assess the firm’s exposure to risky sectors or financial products.
Leverage and Debt: While leverage is part of the business model of banks and insurance firms, excessive debt can raise the risk of insolvency. The focus should be on capital adequacy rather than traditional debt metrics.
Valuation in Practice
Banks: Banks make money through interest spread (difference between loan rates and deposit rates), so understanding interest rate risk and lending policies is critical for their valuation.
Insurance Firms: These firms make money by collecting premiums and investing them until claims need to be paid out. Assessing the profitability of underwriting and the investment strategies used is key to valuing insurance companies.
Conclusion:
Valuing financial service companies requires a different approach due to their reliance on regulatory capital, the role of equity in the valuation process, and their unique risk profiles.
Investors should focus on dividends, capital strength, and return on equity (ROE) when valuing these firms, and consider both the Dividend Discount Model and relative valuation metrics like P/B ratios to assess value.
This chapter emphasizes that while financial firms operate under different rules than non-financial companies, they still offer significant investment opportunities if properly valued based on their capital structure, regulatory environment, and risk profiles.
Chapter 10, titled "Roller-Coaster Investing," from The Little Book of Valuation deals with valuing cyclical and commodity companies. These types of companies are highly sensitive to external factors such as economic cycles and commodity price fluctuations, making them volatile and harder to predict in terms of earnings and cash flow.
Key Topics from Chapter 10:
Two Groups of Companies:
Cyclical companies: These include businesses like housing and automobiles, whose earnings are closely tied to the economy’s overall growth. Their revenues generally fall during economic downturns and rise during recoveries.
Commodity companies: These companies produce raw materials (e.g., oil, iron ore) and are often "price takers," meaning their profitability is significantly impacted by the rise and fall of commodity prices.
Common Characteristics: Both cyclical and commodity companies share two important traits that affect their valuations:
The Economic/Commodity Price Cycle: These companies are at the mercy of economic or commodity price fluctuations, which cause earnings to swing widely. For example, cyclical companies will see revenues drop significantly in economic downturns, while commodity producers benefit from rising prices during commodity booms.
Finite Resources: For commodity companies, the limited availability of natural resources plays a crucial role in future forecasts. Since resources are finite, growth rates may need to be constrained, especially in the terminal value estimation.
Valuation Issues: When valuing these companies, a major challenge is the high sensitivity of inputs like revenue and operating income to changes in economic growth or commodity prices. Their heavy fixed costs mean even minor economic fluctuations can significantly impact profitability. Additionally, maintaining operations during downturns (mines for commodity firms) can be costly.
Debt and Default Risk: The economic cycle's impact also translates to equity and debt values. If economic conditions worsen, companies, no matter how well-managed, can face distress or even default. Hence, assessing cost of capital and distress risks is a key part of the valuation process for these firms.
Relative Valuation: Price-to-earnings multiples for cyclical and commodity companies can vary significantly. For cyclical firms, earnings tend to be more volatile, leading to fluctuating valuations.
Investment Strategies for Cyclical and Commodity Companies:
Commodity Companies: Investors often base their strategies on commodity price forecasts. Firms with large undeveloped reserves and sufficient capital to withstand low prices offer opportunities when commodity prices are expected to rise.
Cyclical Companies: Investors can either try to predict the economic cycle or focus on finding the best companies in the sector, especially those that show strong profitability and efficiency even during downturns.
Real Option Argument for Undeveloped Reserves: The book also touches on how undeveloped reserves in commodity companies are akin to financial options. Their value increases in times of low commodity prices because of the potential upside when prices recover. Traditional discounted cash flow (DCF) models might underestimate these companies' values by not fully accounting for this optionality.
In conclusion, Chapter 10 of The Little Book of Valuation explains that while cyclical and commodity companies provide unique investment opportunities, their valuations are fraught with risks due to their dependence on external factors like economic and commodity price cycles【7:0†source】.
Chapter 11 of The Little Book of Valuation is titled "Invisible Value" and focuses on valuing companies with intangible assets, such as brand names, technological skills, and human capital. These types of companies, which are prominent in the modern economy, require different valuation approaches compared to firms with physical assets.
Key Points from Chapter 11:
Intangible Assets:
Companies like technology and pharmaceutical firms derive most of their value from intangible assets. These include human capital, technological know-how, patents, and brand names. Consumer product companies rely heavily on brand equity, while pharmaceutical firms depend on patented drugs.
The chapter emphasizes the growing importance of these assets, with technology firms representing about 14% of the S&P 500 index in 2008. If you add pharmaceutical and consumer product companies, the proportion is even higher.
Valuation Challenges:
One major issue with valuing companies that have intangible assets is the way these assets are accounted for. For traditional manufacturing companies, physical capital expenditures (e.g., investments in plants and equipment) are treated as capital expenses. However, when it comes to intangible assets, expenditures on research and development (R&D), brand advertising, and workforce training are typically expensed, not capitalized. This results in understated earnings and capital expenditures, making it harder to get an accurate picture of the firm's true value.
Companies with significant intangible assets also tend to use stock options to compensate employees, particularly in the technology and service sectors. This reliance on equity-based compensation further complicates the valuation process.
Valuation Issues:
The misclassification of capital expenses and the greater use of stock options contribute to inaccurate accounting measures, such as book value, earnings, and capital expenditures. These figures do not provide a fair comparison to traditional companies with physical assets.
Firms with intangible assets often avoid using debt, which can create an imbalance when determining their cost of capital. The absence of debt financing makes the cost of equity more critical in their valuations.
Valuation Solutions:
To better value companies with intangible assets, adjustments need to be made for the misclassification of capital expenses. This could mean adjusting reported earnings and capital expenditures to reflect R&D and advertising as long-term investments rather than operating expenses.
It's also important to evaluate the return on these investments in intangible assets. Companies that can leverage their intangibles effectively to generate higher returns will be valued more favorably.
Investing in Intangible Asset Companies:
Investors should focus on companies that make smart investments in intangible assets and can use these assets to produce high returns while protecting shareholder equity. For instance, firms with a strong technological edge or a well-established brand can maintain competitive advantages that lead to sustainable profits.
Chapter 11 concludes that valuing intangible assets requires a nuanced approach, and adjustments must be made to traditional valuation metrics to capture the true value of these companies .
Last updated